Monday, October 25, 2010

Misassociation disproportions individuality.

it's interesting how people allow the quantity of participants in their social atmospheres to dictate who they are
and the quality of interactions they have with others.
am i the better person if i were to continue to give the gift of friendship, companionship?
or am i similarly petty if i withdrew from honest contact and obstructed the path of growth?

My intellect and radiating love never ceases to be be amazed
nor subdued
by how empty minded, self-centered, and sufficiently plastic a person--rather than being an individual--can be.

when does eagerness and volunteered comfort and guidance
become desperation and idiocy?

how is it so difficult a task to feel comfortable underneath your skin?
how is it so sure, bold, and certain that following another's false trail is the definition of your individuality?

when unaccompanied, you are alone and unsure of your surroundings.
you behave so inattentively and stationary.
so lost.

and it is then that i turn around and question myself for wasting such an association.

No comments: